China’s New Assertiveness Is An Emerging Threat To Southeast Asia’s Stability – OpEd
The disruption of regional stability and global commerce epitomizes China’s progressively bolder behavior in the South China Sea. The following essay examines how China’s nonchalant approach to fellow nations’ sovereignty, eroding confidence in diplomacy, and the necessity of a manifold approach threaten the global community.
China’s Lack of Respect for Sovereignty
What China is doing in the Philippines goes waters beyond asserting its rights over disputed territories in the South China Sea. The sovereignty of nations like the Philippines is directly challenged China by’s actions: ramming Filipino fishing vessels with Chinese coast guard boats, preventing deliveries to Philippine military outposts, and building artificial islands and military bases on threatened reefs and atolls. moves These jeopardize not only the Philippines’ territorial integrity but also the livelihoods of its fishermen and the region’s fragile marine ecosystem.
Diplomatic Trust Erodes
With its defiant behavior, China’s involvement in diplomatic endeavors such as the “Potential Managing Conflict in the South China Sea” workshop appears unauthentic. Its establishment of the “nine-dash line” maritime claim and use of water cannons against smaller ships indicate that China does not prioritize nonviolent conflict resolution. after almost two decades of halted discussions for a Code of Conduct (COC) with ASEAN and between ASEAN and China, we question whether China genuinely means what it says.
A multifaceted approach is necessary
To address this confounding situation realist ideals and measures must be taken at the same time. Realist measures take the form of bolstering the defense capabilities of Southeast Asian nations and forming strategic partnerships with nations like the United States which strengthen deterrence against Chinese aggression and safeguard the interests of claimant states.
In the realm of idealism diplomacy and respect for international law are vital. It is essential to continue to push China to honor international agreements the especially United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). In addition, continuing to work towards a binding Code of Conduct (COC) to guide future disputes is important to show a dedication to peaceful coexistence and the rule of law.
The Role of ASEAN and the Global Community
ASEAN is very important. Brunei and others have pushed back against China’s claims and stressed adherence to UNCLOS. But it is stymied by internal divisions, particularly with states that do so much business with the Chinese. ASEAN has to do a better job of resisting Beijing’s aggression, and it has the economic clout to try and compel responsible behavior.
In the event China’s assertiveness increases the international community, including its ally the U. S . may need to get more involved. The Philippines which has a defense pact with the U. S. has already rebuked China’s actions. Apprehending further aggression and making sure the South China Sea is left traversable and open for worldwide trade and navigation may heavily depend on our involvement along with that of our allies.
Conclusion
In conclusion, there are many ways that technology has changed our lives for the better. It has improved communication transportation healthcare, and many other areas. Whether we think it is good or bad it is hard to deny that it seems here to stay. In many ways, have we become slaves to technology, but the benefits far outweigh the negatives. It has created new opportunities for people and improved the quality of life here in the US and around the world.
The aggressive maneuvers Beijing is making in the South China Sea not only threaten regional stability challenges but norms global and security as well. A decisive response that includes diplomatic outreach adherence to international laws and agreements, regional alliances, and economic leverage is imperative. Furthermore prioritizing environmental protections promoting transparency and creating mechanisms for conflict prevention are all essential. With long-term commitment from all parties, regional peace can be secured national can interests be protected, and the South China Sea can remain a zone of cooperation, not competition.
The opinions expressed in this article are the author’s own.
Reference
- Coles, Michael. “China’s South China Sea Actions Compared to a ‘Schoolyard Bully.'” The Diplomat, The Diplomat Magazine, 14 Apr. 2016, https://thediplomat.com/tag/south-china-sea/.
- Guilfoyle, Conor, and Jake Easton Chang. “China’s Coast Guard Harasses Filipino Boats in Disputed Waters.” Reuters, Thomson Reuters, 21 Mar. 2022, https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/philippines-accuses-china-more-harassment-near-disputed-reef-2023-07-05/.
- Hyer, Tara. “The ‘South China Sea Code of Conduct’: A Stalemated Negotiation Process.” Council on Foreign Relations, cfr.org, 24 Sept. 2020, https://asiatimes.com/2023/04/compromises-necessary-for-code-of-conduct-in-s-china-sea/.
- Lawson, Victoria. “Deterrence by Other Means? Assessing the Utility of Regional Cooperation to Counter China’s Expansionism in the South China Sea.” International Security, vol. 43, no. 1, 2018, pp. 70-103., doi:10.1162/sec.a.03822.
- McKendry, John. “Has ASEAN Lost Control of the South China Sea?”. The Interpreter, Lowy Institute, 20 July 2020, https://foreignpolicy.com/2023/09/15/southeast-asia-asean-china-us-security-geopolitics-south-china-sea-alliances/.
- Nguyễn Anh, Toàn. “The South China Sea Dispute: A Brewing Conflict?” International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law, vol. 3