ISSN 2330-717X

Hillary Clinton’s DOJ Donors Prove ‘Fix Is In’ – OpEd

By

Democratic Party presidential hopeful Hillary Clinton’s chief aide, Cheryl Mills, and her attorney reportedly stormed out of her interview by FBI agents regarding Hillary’s privately installed and utilized email system and Internet server. The Washington Post claims that one of the FBI agents asked Mills a question and she left the interview complaining the question was inappropriate.

The newspaper also claims that after a brief meeting between Cheryl Mills and Beth Wilkinson, her legal counsel, the two women returned to the interview room. Also it has been intimated by law enforcement insiders that Mills and Wilkinson requested several breaks from the interview in order to confer privately.

According to Conservative Base law-enforcement source Laurence McCaffrey, he was led to believe that the interview question that caused Mills and Wilkinson to walk out had to do with the procedure used to produce emails for possible public release by the State Department.

Mills refused to answer questions about it because her attorney and Attorney General Loretta Lynch’s Justice Department attorneys agreed it was confidential and therefore FBI agents were prevented to delving into the allegations about private server.

The FBI has continued investigating possible gross mishandling of classified information and Clinton’s use of an unsecured personal account exclusively for government business. Investigators have already interviewed two of Clinton’s top aides, Mills and Huma Abedin, and hope to be able to interview Clinton herself as they wrap up the case. There are also allegations of illegal activity at the so-called Clinton family charity the Clinton Foundation.

“Based on these latest reports, I would say the FBI is being handcuffed by Justice Department lawyers in order to protect the Democrats’ heir apparent to the White House,” said Laurence McCaffrey, a former criminal investigator specializing in white-collar crime and corporate espionage. “There is evidence that the ‘fix is in’ at the Justice Department, a department that openly allowed its lawyers and investigators to donate money to the Clinton campaign,” he added.

According to the Washington Free Beacon, Hillary Clinton garnered $75,000.00 in political donations from taxpayer-paid Justice Department workers so far. “This is the department which will determine whether there should be criminal charges leveled against the Clinton and others for using an unauthorized private e-mail server,” said political strategist Michael Baker.

The Justice Department workers’ political donations to the Clinton campaign exceed the amount of money they gave to her rivals Democrat Bernie Sanders and Republican candidate Donald Trump. Clinton received $73,437 from over 200 Justice Department employees. Twelve of the DOJ staff are reported to have donated the maximum $2,700 to Hillary for President coffers.

Dave Bossie, leader of the watchdog group Citizens United, claims he’s far from being surprised. “I’m not surprised in the least to see more evidence that shows the politicization of the Justice Department,” Bossie said. “How can Democrat political appointees fairly investigate someone who is about to become their nominee for president? That’s why last July I called on Attorney General Lynch to appoint an impartial special counsel to investigate the private Clinton email server.”

Click here to have Eurasia Review's newsletter delivered via RSS, as an email newsletter, via mobile or on your personal news page.

Jim Kouri

Jim Kouri, CPP, formerly Fifth Vice-President, is currently a Board Member of the National Association of Chiefs of Police, an editor for ConservativeBase.com, and he's a columnist for Examiner.com. In addition, he's a blogger for the Cheyenne, Wyoming Fox News Radio affiliate KGAB (www.kgab.com). Kouri also serves as political advisor for Emmy and Golden Globe winning actor Michael Moriarty.

2 thoughts on “Hillary Clinton’s DOJ Donors Prove ‘Fix Is In’ – OpEd

  • May 12, 2016 at 7:08 pm
    Permalink

    I believe it is highly critical and RELEVANT for the FBI investigators and the American citizens to know the procedures undertaken by Hillary’s aids – INCLUDING MILLS, in determining the emails requested for release. WHY SHOULD THAT BE OFF-LIMITS ON THE ATTY-CLIENT CONFIDENTIALITY BASIS??? SHE IS NOT BEING INVESTIGATED AS HILLARY’S COUNSEL — SHE WAS HILLARY’S CHIEF OF STAFF AND IT WAS HER TAXPAYERS-PAID PRIMARY ROLL. She is not being deposed there as Hillary’s lawyer (David E. Kendall is Hillary’s atty) but as Hillary’s Chief of Staff AID, with firsthand knowledge of the day-to-day operation. The Attorney-Client Privilege provision is not applicable in the case at hand. Mill’s being a lawyer is incidental here – plain and simple. The QUEST FOR THE TRUTH – and NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH trumps over her lawyer background. It is so incomprehensible what we are witnessing before our eyes — in the face of so-called democracy, one nation under God. EVIL, LYING and MULTIPLIED CORRUPTION is on display before our very own eyes, by these bands of wicked and unregenerate creatures to wit: Hillary and her whole entourage, entire DOJ and Lynch, Bill Clinton and daughter, Obama and all his cohorts. We must really be living in the end-times when evil is undeniably so widespread and continuing — that the inerrant Word of God be fulfilled. In 2 TIMOTHY 3.1-5 it reads thus: 1This know also, that in the last days perilous times shall come. 2For men shall be lovers of their own selves, covetous, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, 3Without natural affection, trucebreakers, false accusers, incontinent, fierce, despisers of those that are good, 4Traitors, heady, highminded, lovers of pleasures more than lovers of God; 5Having a form of godliness, but denying the power thereof: from such turn away.

    Reply
  • May 12, 2016 at 10:01 pm
    Permalink

    How can Ms. Mills claim to be a “cooperating witness”, when she walks out of the FBI interview? Obviously, she has fashioned the “attorney-client privilege” as a means to invoke her right to remain silent. What the nation is left with thus far, is two witnesses – Pagliano and Mills – who have asserted their right to remain silent for fear of self-incrimination. Pagliano is protected by an immunity deal, Mills by political allies. They can run, but they cannot hide.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.