Middle East: A Ticking Time Bomb Amid Escalating Conflicts – OpEd

By

The Middle East continues to serve as a crucible of conflict, where political instability, military confrontations, and economic upheaval collide. In 2024, the region remains volatile, with fears of even darker days ahead. One key factor in the ongoing instability is the near one-year anniversary of the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) attacks on Gaza, which sparked renewed waves of violence and redefined the geopolitical landscape. As we review the factors behind the ongoing conflicts, it becomes clear that the Middle East is akin to a ticking time bomb, with far-reaching implications for local populations and global economies alike.

The Gaza Strip has long been a flashpoint in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, but the events of October 2023 took the violence to unprecedented levels. Almost one year ago, Hamas launched a surprise series of attacks on Israeli targets, prompting a swift and brutal military response from the IDF. Gaza bore the brunt of the Israeli retaliation, with airstrikes targeting Hamas strongholds as well as civilian infrastructure. The situation rapidly escalated, leading to significant loss of life and a humanitarian crisis in Gaza. 

Now, as the one-year anniversary of the IDF’s attacks approaches, the region is still reeling from the aftermath. Thousands of civilians remain displaced, essential infrastructure lies in ruins, and the trauma of the conflict continues to haunt both Palestinians and Israelis. The international community’s calls for restraint and diplomacy have yielded little progress. The entrenchment of both sides’ positions—the Israelis defending their right to security and Palestinians calling for an end to occupation—has further polarized the situation. The one-year mark of the Gaza conflict serves as a grim reminder of the cyclical nature of violence in the region.

The Middle East’s instability is not just a political and humanitarian issue; it is also wreaking havoc on the global economy. The region is a key supplier of oil, and any disruption in its stability sends shockwaves through the energy markets. The continuing conflict has directly led to rising oil prices, with fears that tensions could expand to other oil-producing countries like Iran or Saudi Arabia. In the last few weeks, the price of oil has surged dramatically due to the escalating situation.

This rise in oil prices has broader consequences, impacting countries worldwide. For energy-importing nations, higher oil prices mean increased costs across various sectors, including transportation, manufacturing, and food supply chains. Inflationary pressures are beginning to mount, and there are growing concerns that prolonged conflict in the Middle East could exacerbate the global cost-of-living crisis. Although oil-producing nations may see short-term economic benefits from the price surge, sustained conflict threatens their long-term stability and economic growth.

From an international relations perspective, the situation in the Middle East exemplifies the principles of realism, which posits that states operate in an anarchic international system where power and survival are paramount. According to realism, the behavior of key actors in the region—such as Israel, Iran, and Saudi Arabia—can be understood as driven by self-interest, national security concerns, and the pursuit of power. Each of these states is maneuvering within a competitive environment, seeking to either maintain or expand its influence and secure its own survival.

The realist perspective also helps explain the limited effectiveness of diplomatic efforts in resolving the conflict. For instance, Israel’s military actions in Gaza are framed as necessary for national defense, while Hamas views its armed resistance as a fight for survival and self-determination. In such a system, the prospects for cooperation and peace are slim because trust is low and every actor is wary of potential threats to its own security. This realist lens sheds light on why the Middle East remains a hotbed of conflict despite numerous international peace initiatives.

What makes the situation even more dangerous is the risk of a broader conflict engulfing the region. Iran, a key regional power with close ties to Palestinian militant groups, has so far avoided direct military involvement. However, the possibility that Iran could intervene if the conflict escalates further is ever-present. Tehran has already warned that continued Israeli operations in Gaza and Lebanon could provoke a response, potentially plunging the region into an all-out war. The involvement of other powers like Hezbollah, along with Iran’s potential direct involvement, would push the Middle East into even deeper chaos.

Beyond Iran, there are concerns about the potential for proxy wars to intensify. Regional powers such as Saudi Arabia, Turkey, and the UAE have vested interests in the outcome of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and the broader regional dynamics. Their involvement, either through direct military actions or by funding and supporting proxy groups, could further destabilize the region. Syria, Yemen, and Libya are all examples of how proxy conflicts in the Middle East have devastated local populations and created conditions for prolonged instability. The Israeli-Palestinian conflict risks becoming another theater for such proxy wars, with devastating consequences.

Attempts to negotiate peace or de-escalate the conflict have made little progress. The international community, including the United Nations and European powers, has repeatedly called for ceasefires and peaceful negotiations, but these efforts have largely failed. U.S. involvement has been crucial, but Washington’s unwavering support for Israel complicates its role as a mediator. While the U.S. has called for restraint, it has consistently reaffirmed Israel’s right to defend itself, alienating much of the Arab world and limiting the possibility for dialogue.

Other global powers like Russia and China have seized the opportunity to challenge Western influence in the region. Both nations have aligned themselves with various actors, often through economic or military support, further complicating the geopolitical landscape. These divisions within the international community hinder any meaningful diplomatic efforts, creating a deadlock that allows the violence to continue unabated.

The Middle East, now approaching one year since the devastating Gaza conflict, remains trapped in a cycle of violence and instability. Rising oil prices, ongoing military confrontations, and the looming threat of wider regional conflict all contribute to a dangerous situation that shows no signs of abating. The realist perspective in international relations helps explain why peace remains elusive in a region where power and survival dominate the agenda. Unless there is a fundamental shift in both regional and global approaches to the Middle East, the region will remain a ticking time bomb—one whose explosion will be felt around the world.

As we move closer to the one-year anniversary of the Gaza attacks, the Middle East stands at a crossroads. Without a genuine push for lasting peace and diplomacy, the region is likely to witness further chaos, making the world increasingly vulnerable to the ripple effects of its instability.

Sehr Rushmeen

Sehr Rushmeen, an Islamabad based freelance researcher, did her MPhil from National Defence University (NDU) in Strategic Studies and her BSc from University of London (UOL) in International Relations. Her area of research interest is Strategic Nuclear Studies, Artificial Intelligence in Warfare, Conflict Zone in Middle East, South China Sea and South Asian Politics. Has several publications in renowned regional and international newspapers and magazines. She tweets by the handle @rushmeentweets and can be reached on [email protected]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *