Of Canada, Khadr, Chief Nelson And Iran – OpEd

By

After 10 years in Guantanamo, former child soldier Omar Khadr, the last Western national being held there, was finally repatriated September 29, 2012 after years of mistreatment. The illegality of the procedures used against Khadr from day one mean that the Canadian government faces a multi-million dollar law suit for damages.

Various court cases against the government failed to convince it to expedite his return, until the U.S. government finally pulled the plug, forcing the Canadian government to take him after his plea of guilty to various charges, clearly made as the only way to end his ordeal and give him hope of eventual release.

At the same time, Egyptian Prosecutor General Abdel Meguid Mahmud has issued arrest warrants for Canadian Egyptians Nader Fawzy and Jacques Attalla of Montreal, claiming they were involved in the production of the film “Innocence of Muslims”, which defames Islam and led to the death of dozens including the U.S. ambassador to Libya, and the closing of Canada’s embassies in Egypt and Libya (since reopened).

Of course, both Coptic Christian activists insist on their own “innocence”. Attalla asked for police protection, claiming he and his family in Egypt are now targets of potential violence, calling the arrest warrant issued by the prosecutor general a “fatwa”. As if to confirm his own guilt, Attalla said, “Egypt was exporting civilisation before and now it’s exporting terrorism and killing and hatred.” It will take some doing for the Conservatives to finesse this diplomatic tangle.

To top it all off, there are the ongoing ramifications of the breaking of relations with Iran in September, disrupting the lives of thousands of Iranians in Canada and making it virtually impossible for Canadians to go to Iran. One Canadian who is willing to defy the government action is former chief of Manitoba’s Roseau River First Nation Terrance Nelson, who is travelling to Tehran (via Switzerland) as part of an exploratory mission to discuss resource development and human rights abuses in Canada.

Nelson said Iranians and Canada’s natives have a lot in common as victims of European colonialism. The Indian Act was passed in 1876 by the Parliament of Canada, confirming the expropriation of native lands that had taken place since the first white settlers came, and the relegation of natives to “reserves” under the federal government’s authority.

In Iran at that time, Western capitalists were bribing the corrupt Nasser al-Din Shah to allow them to control the entire Persian economy. A century of invasion, subversion and rule by more Western-backed shahs finally ended in 1979, when Western domination came to an abrupt end, but in the process turned Iran into the West’s bete noire, demonized in the mainstream media ever since.

The First Nation leader was grilled by the National Post in a joint interview with Iranian-born activist (and former Miss World Canada) Nazanin Afshin-Jam, who also just happens to be the wife of Defence Minister Peter MacKay. She called Nelson’s trip “a real insult to Iranians, Canadians and the entire international community” and accused Iran of wanting “to use him for the purposes of demonizing Canada in forums such as the UN Human Rights Council”.

When asked to condemn Iran on human rights abuses, Nelson pointed out that there are serious human rights abuses in Canada which are not given prominence in the mainstream media. He complained that the hysteria in the media made it very difficult for him to pursue his efforts to gain recognition for Canada’s native people. “What the western media says is not always true. Nobody gave a damn about half-a-million children dying in Iraq in 1998.”

When it was suggested that the Iranian government would enlist First Nations to perpetrate violence against Canada, he laughed. “When have First Nations people ever bombed anything? The worst we’ve ever done is make the white man late for lunch when we do our protests in the city street.” He accused the West of perpetrating insidious violence against countries it victimizes through sanctions, including against both Iraq in the 1990s and Iran today.

He said his hope was to break down the unjustified bias against Iran. “We know what demonization is all about because we’ve been demonized in our own land.” Nelson praised Tehran for raising the human rights issues of indigenous people in Canada and called for the Non-Aligned Movement, which Iran now presides over, to address the plight of Canada’s aboriginal population.

As for Afshin-Jam’s claim that the Iranian government was using native Canadians to blacken Canada’s reputation at the UN, there is no need, as there is lots of evidence of Canadian government negligence of human rights under the current Conservative regime. At the top of the list is the defunding of five renowned human rights NGOs – the International Centre for Human Rights and Democratic Development, the Canadian Human Rights Commission, Kairos, Status of Women Canada and the Court Challenges Program – affecting tens of thousands of Canadians and victims of violence around the world.

Harper and the Parliament

Furthermore, Stephen Harper prorogued Parliament twice, becoming the first prime minister ever to be found guilty of contempt of Parliament, and flagrantly ignores freedom of speech by muzzling senior bureaucrats, withholding and altering documents, and launching personal attacks on whistleblowers. There is an ongoing investigation into voting fraud perpetrated by the Conservatives in the last election.

Despite Harper’s notoriety, he was chosen 2012 World Statesman of the Year for his work as a “champion of democracy, freedom and human rights” by the Appeal of Conscience Foundation (set up by Rabbi Arthur Schneier in 1965). He chose to boycott the UN gathering of heads of state taking place just down the street in New York (perhaps afraid of criticism?). Instead, in his address at the Waldorf Astoria, he accused the UN of wooing dictators with an “appalling record of human rights abuse”, implying of course the Iranian leadership.

But he should consider his own “appalling record of human rights abuse”. And answer Terrance Nelson’s question: “If the Iranian government is willing to take our case forward, that is fine. Why isn’t the German government, or the American government, or the English government, or the French government doing it? Why hasn’t the Israeli government said anything? Have they condemned Canada?”

Eric Walberg writes for Al-Ahram Weekly http://weekly.ahram.org.eg/ and is author of Postmodern Imperialism: Geopolitics and the Great Games. He can be reached at: http://ericwalberg.com/

Eric Walberg

Canadian Eric Walberg is known worldwide as a journalist specializing in the Middle East, Central Asia and Russia. A graduate of University of Toronto and Cambridge in economics, he has been writing on East-West relations since the 1980s. He has lived in both the Soviet Union and Russia, and then Uzbekistan, as a UN adviser, writer, translator and lecturer. Presently a writer for the foremost Cairo newspaper, Al Ahram, he is also a regular contributor to Counterpunch, Dissident Voice, Global Research, Al-Jazeerah and Turkish Weekly, and is a commentator on Voice of the Cape radio.

One thought on “Of Canada, Khadr, Chief Nelson And Iran – OpEd

  • October 14, 2012 at 3:32 am
    Permalink

    Their actions on the Khadr case are certainly inexplicable. Every US and Canadian government involved in this case over the last decade was influenced by political concerns, but this current Canadian government seems motivated by a peculiar vindictiveness besides.

    They have worked tirelessly in endless fights with the courts, and Parliament when they were in a minority situation, to undermine Khadr.

    Given their attitude, it’s not clear why they signed the transfer agreement on Khadr with the US in the first place. Their diplomatic note indicates they understood Khadr’s guilty plea was conditional on the US and Canada reflecting support for his transfer. There is nothing in the document about public safety concerns except in the section on possibility of parole in the future.

    A year and a half after signing this agreement, they advised the US they had to have material produced by a psychiatrist hired for the Prosecution, and claimed to have had no awareness of its existence before then.

    This psychiatrist testified at length at the trial right after the agreement was signed almost two years ago. He discussed his opinions with the media and his testimony created controversy, because of his predictions about Khadr’s supposed dangerousness and challenges to his own credibility at the trial, for consulting on the case with a man known for highly negative generalizations about Muslims.

    The US sent the Harper Government the material and they announced it could take months to review. Most of this information was already public. Macleans magazine somehow obtained the complete package and wrote an article about it. That seemed to open the door for the US to complain about security breach, and pressure the Harper Government into finally accepting the transfer.

    But, once again the vindictiveness came through. The document they signed approving the transfer further demonizes Khadr, and adds new accusations beyond either the charges or the confession for the plea bargain. Then they claimed, as they have before, that decisions on Khadr wont be politically influenced.

    One of the psychiatrists for the Defense wrote a letter to the NYT complaining that his opinion was sent to the Harper Government months ago, and ignored. The Harper Government has never explained its obsession with this one man’s opinion. His name is the only one mentioned in the transfer approval document.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *