ISSN 2330-717X

US Is Suffering Severe Case Of Palinosis – OpEd

By

I hope I never write another piece on Sarah Palin again.

The woman is a disease, and I choose my words carefully there. She is everything that is wrong with America, and indeed, that is the only reason I’m writing this at all. This essay is altogether far more a commentary on Governor Quit’s America than it is on the woman herself. Our national problem is Palinosis far more than it is Palin.

There have always been people like Sarah Palin, and presumably there always will be. The two real questions are why anyone cares about them and, most astonishingly, why anyone would seriously contemplate putting them in charge of a country of 300 million people.

Palin the person is back in the news again right now (and notice that she makes sure never to really be absent) for two reasons. First, because she’s launched this wild bus tour which reminds one of those nested Russian dolls where you open each one up and there’s another inside. This tour is a ‘family vacation’, inside of which is Palin’s public service mission of educating the rest of us about American history, inside of which is a faux flirtation with presidential politics, inside of which is a relentless, endless series of publicity stunts masquerading as a human being, inside of which is an utterly shameless money-grubbing cash cow, inside of which is a frightened little girl whose insecurities could make George W. Bush look like a paragon of self-confidence in comparison. At the end of the day, she has become essentially the Paris Hilton of politics. She is famous for being famous, and she’s masterful at that one thing and that one thing only.

“I’m publicizing Americana and our foundation and how important it is that we learn about our past and our challenges and victories throughout American history, so that we can successfully proceed forward”, Palin informed the ridiculously obsessed press following her everywhere on her national wild goose chase. “It’s not a campaign tour.” Right. That’s why it’s in a big, painted bus, and she has the media scurrying after her. Every family vacation’s that way, isn’t it? And, by the way, even if by some bizarre random quirk of stochastic physics she was actually being honest about her motivations, isn’t more ill-informed self-reverential adoration of our national wonderfulness just what America needs right now, as the country is imploding in every way imaginable? And who is more perfectly poised to provide that lesson than the esteemed Professor Palin, so erudite and multifarious is her skills that she can simultaneously use mangled syntax, by which to display her emotional neediness, in the form of distorted history lessons? How many of us can claim such abilities?

The half-term governor knew that if she loaded up a busload of family members and painted the bus with patriotic pictures and slogans a few microns deep, and that if she ran around at the same time (and even the same place) that other Republicans were announcing their campaigns, she could generate a boatload of media attention to come in her direction. This is a good time for it, too. Since she will not actually be running for president herself (the money’s no good, and it seems like an awful lot of work!), she no doubt realizes that her celebrity shelf-life is about to go south in a hurry. Once Republicans pick a nominee (likely Romney, and likely quickly), she will be of a lot less interest than she is now. Peripheral Palin’s remaining cards to play at that moment will essentially include criticizing the GOP nominee and criticizing the Democratic nominee. The former will not be welcome by regressives during a presidential campaign for obvious reasons, and the latter will actually not either, because Palin only cheapens any Republican candidate’s message to independents with her idiotic comments about Obama. She is the best thing that could happen to the president, even if she isn’t on the ticket.

I think she well understands that her relevancy meter is fast running down, and she is about to become some tawdry, laughable Dan Quayle-type thing, a creature that even (or especially) regressives wish in retrospect they could forget about. Indeed, I think Palin is probably secretly still in drop-jaw astonishment herself that she ever got any of the attention she’s managed to garner so far. So she is milking every remaining drop of it that she can grab before she’s sent to the remainders bin. When asked if she was leaning toward or against running, she replied as only she can, “Still right there in the middle”. Oh, god. I need to hurl. I don’t know who is worse, Palin uttering such dribble or the media for sucking it up like it remotely matters. Nor could she help turning the knife she had miraculously been able to slip into Mitt Romney – despite there being nothing there of substance to stab – by stomping all over his presidential candidacy announcement extravaganza. She then added a bit of her own special brand of catty mockery to the mix: “I apologize if I stepped on any, any of that PR that Mitt Romney needed or wanted that day. I do sincerely apologize. I didn’t mean to step on anybody’s toes.”

All of this would be truly ugly, except that it’s both entertaining and cosmically righteous to see regressives clobbering each other. Couldn’t happen to a nicer lot. And the other good news is that it seems many Americans have finally figured out most of what needs to be understood about this abomination in a skirt.

Which also explains another way in which Palin made the headlines last week, this time by making clear, yet again, how utterly and astonishingly vacuous she is. She proved it again by flunking American History 101, laughably flubbing a question most second-graders could readily handle. Knowing who Paul Revere was is like knowing who Santa is. Not for Savvy Sarah, though, who responded thusly: “He who warned the British that they weren’t gonna be takin’ away our arms by ringing those bells, and makin’ sure as he’s riding his horse through town to send those warning shots and bells that we were going to be sure and we were going to be free, and we were going to be armed.”

Okay, leave aside the rambling incoherence of her remarks. Sometimes spontaneous, on-the-spot answers to press questions can legitimately have that quality (which – hello, regressives! – might explain why Barack Obama (and lots of other politicians) use a teleprompter when they speak. She obviously wasn’t expecting the question, though she can just as obviously be seen in the above passage to be scrambling to think of an answer, and doing her ‘thinking’ out loud. And leave aside, as well, the mysterious “He who…” construction I’ve heard her use before. There’s definitely some twisted pathology loaded up in that phrasing, but I’m not psycho-linguistically astute enough to take it apart. All that aside, what remains is the breathtaking absence of basic historical knowledge on the part of this frequent public scold on matters of American patriotism (as she defines them).

So egregious was Palin’s boner that even Pox Snooze, which happens to be a relentless promoter of bother Palin and Palinism, not to mention her employer, was forced to come to grips with it. “Anchor” Chris Wallace asked her, “You realize that you messed up about Paul Revere, don’t you?” Well, no, actually, she doesn’t: “I didn’t mess up about Paul Revere. Part of his ride was to warn the British that were already there. That, hey, you’re not going to succeed. You’re not going to take American arms. You are not going to beat our own well-armed persons, individual, private militia that we have. He did warn the British. I know my American history.”

Maybe she does, and maybe I’m the Queen of England. But it seems more likely that she doesn’t (and I’m definitely not). In the same way she didn’t quite seem to know what journals she reads, when the question was innocuously asked by Katie Couric. Or that she seemed to think that she was an experienced hand at foreign policy because the state she governed (until she quit, to accept the much better paying Paris Hilton gig) was sorta close to Vladimir Putin’s Russia. And you know how threatening those Ruskies are, always rattling their sabers in our direction… Well, back in the Fifties, anyhow…. You know, when the Founders were fighting the Revolutionary War… Against the French… Hence, the need to warn the British… Er, sumptin’ like that.

Like I said, there will always be Sarah Palins in this world. The real questions are why they gather the attention they do, and why we would ever dream of making them our national leaders. There is a related flip-side to that question, as well, which goes to why Barack Obama – who is the personal, but definitely not political, antithesis of a Sarah Palin – is so reviled in these same quarters, and why so much effort is made to diminish him, by questioning his citizenship authenticity, his college grades, his religion, his intelligence and his use of teleprompters in making speeches.

As it happens, I loathe Barack Obama as well. But differently, and definitely for different reasons. I despise him because he in fact actually has nearly the same politics of the folks on the right who hate him so viscerally. You could never possibly convince them of that, of course, but it is a simple fact. If you just look dispassionately at his policies – ranging from wars with Muslim countries, to global warming, to taxes, to civil liberties, and even to civil rights and health care – the real truth is that there’s hardly any difference between Obama and, say, Bush/Cheney. Indeed, in many respects – Afghanistan, civil liberties, immigration roundups, Guantánamo – Obama is even worse than Bush/Cheney.

Which makes it so remarkable that folks on the right hate him so. They’re far too scared-stupid to realize it, of course, but this guy is not even a liberal, let alone a socialist. His politics are largely their politics. So what gives? Why the hatred toward Obama by the same people who adore Palin?

Fundamentally, I suspect it has to do with the implicit condemnation his character puts on their recklessness and greed. When the Bush/Cheney Cowboy Show was in town, all your worst tendencies could be expressed and not only was it not frowned upon, hell, it was national policy. Gimme, gimme, gimme. Oil, money, food, money, war, money, booze, money, tax cuts, money, debt, money, environmental destruction, money, Humvees, money, bigotry, money, Wall Street, money, civil liberties slashing, money, Abu Ghraib, money, and so on. Did I mention money? The funny thing (hah-freakin’-hah) is that Obama’s policies are nearly identical in all these respects, however, he doesn’t say so (in order to keep his stupid base on his side), and he carries himself in a much more adult, rational, responsible and confident manner. And that really flames people who are none of those things.

I think they especially hate Obama not so much because he’s black or he’s a Northerner or a Democrat or young. It’s all those things, to be sure. But I think what really drives the Palinista right crazy when it comes to Obama is ultimately the air of responsibility he projects. And unlike Bush or Palin, Obama is not afraid of getting caught being intelligent in public. I think that alone incenses people on the right, but mostly it’s that they want to live recklessly and greedily, and therefore they despise anyone, or anything, or any action or words, that remotely remind them of their recklessness and greed. Say whatever you want about Obama – and I have, and will continue to – he is clearly very intelligent, very thoughtful, highly disciplined and ridiculously measured. I think that alone drives people on the lazy, greedy right absolutely ape-shit in response, because it sorta shoves in their faces their own gross irresponsibility, and nobody likes being reminded of the harm they’ve caused to others (not to mention that such avoidance is, itself, a powerful form of laziness and greed).

Put it all together and ours is the strangest political moment, perhaps in human history. I say that not only because the tropes in our public discourse are so bizarre, but because, above all, the stakes are now so high. We live at a time when those who are the most angry and agitated in their politics are the very ones who have driven the country (and, in many respects, the world) off the cliff. And yet they endlessly preach to us about responsibility and morality.

There are no depths to the levels of duplicity and hypocrisy plumbed here, and there is no limit to the destruction being contemplated. Think about the damage that already litters the landscape, and the lies necessary to wipe away the fingerprints upon it.

What’s worse than dictating to everyone else what their sexual practices must be, while simultaneously engaging in every manner of debauchery themselves?

Perhaps it would be ranting endlessly about the virtues of the “free market” while constantly shilling for all forms of corporate welfare and bleeding the country dry.

Or perhaps it is selling massive tax cuts for the wealthy on the premise that such giveaways would provide us a great economy, and then delivering the Great Recession instead.

Or maybe it’s exploding the national debt to pay for wars and tax cuts and corporate welfare and a giant ‘defense’ establishment against no real enemy, and then demanding that seniors and the poor and the middle class be kicked to the gutter because there is no money left to pay for social programs.

Or perhaps instead it would be plunging the country into a war that claimed as many as a million lives, all on the basis of lies.

Or maybe lying about and ignoring global warming, the planet’s greatest threat ever, in order to protect the short-term profits of a handful of oil and coal tycoons.

These are among the worst gifts of regressivism, whose greatest exemplar in our time is Sarah Palin. She is the ultimate nothingburger, herself. History will regard her as a cheap and rather harmless latter day Joe McCarthy.

But her politics are our national disease – Palinosis – and we have a lethal dose.

It is the politics of insecurity.

It’s the politics of hate.

It’s the politics of deceit.

It’s the politics of hypocrisy.

It’s the politics of laziness.

It’s the politics of irresponsibility.

It’s the politics of ignorance.

It’s the politics of destruction.

But, most of all, it is the politics of greed.

Click here to have Eurasia Review's newsletter delivered via RSS, as an email newsletter, via mobile or on your personal news page.

David Michael Green

David Michael Green is a professor of political science at Hofstra University in New York

16 thoughts on “US Is Suffering Severe Case Of Palinosis – OpEd

  • June 14, 2011 at 10:09 pm
    Permalink

    LOL>…

    Dude really, ur a prof>?

    LOL….lol!

    I can not stop laughing. Okay let me get this straight? You think Palin is what is wrong with America? Freaking Move WeinerBoy…!

    Sincerely,

    Not you.

    Reply
  • June 14, 2011 at 10:54 pm
    Permalink

    For someone choosing their words very carefully, you put them together very poorly. “Governor Quit”? Seriously.

    More amusing is starting your article with “This woman is a disease” next to a self-taken picture of a young woman with pursed lips advertising a hook-up site. Very educational.

    Reply
  • June 14, 2011 at 11:09 pm
    Permalink

    Wow, talk about “the politics of hate.” Palin Derangement Syndrome. Love how she bugs you people. LOL

    Reply
  • June 14, 2011 at 11:14 pm
    Permalink

    Yet another commie professor telling those of that work for a living what rubes we really are. Ahhh Comrad Green, it is a shame we just don’t pay our taxes, hand our children over to the likes of you and just shut our traps up. Looks like American universities are where the next house cleaning needs to take place…

    Reply
  • June 14, 2011 at 11:17 pm
    Permalink

    Wow, that’s quite a rant, Green. Of course, I had a good idea of it’s content before the first paragraph, given your professorship at Hofstra, your insistence on using all three of your names, and your sick fascination with Palin.

    She really is living in your head rent free, isn’t she? But it’s not in a studio apartment, it’s on the scale of Al Gore’s mansion.

    Maybe you’d like to know why so many Americans actually like her. I know what I find attractive; she speaks from the heart, she loves her country, and she mirrors the very same views of many.

    Nobody can explain the press’ fascination with her, it’s downright Pavlovian. Maybe this is why she’s such a big burr under your saddle, she snaps her fingers and it’s front page news. A little jealousy at work, perhaps?

    Of course, no rant would be complete without continuing jabs at Bush and Cheney, along with smearing those who disagree with you as “regressives”, and your continued defense of our worst president in history. I hate to be the one to tell you, but you’ve hitched your wagon to a star that is quickly plummeting toward the sea. Unfortunately, the rest of our country doesn’t have a choice but be dragged along into suicidal socialism.

    I hope you found your diatribe theraputic at least. I found it quite entertaining, and I was a bit surprised to find there are educators like you still stuck in the social revolution of the late 1960s. Is THIS what our kids are being taught today? You need to get out more.

    Come off campus for a bit, and look around. A lot has changed in the last 40 years. And you’ll feel better for it.

    Reply
  • June 14, 2011 at 11:26 pm
    Permalink

    Dude….that sounds like a Weiner rant.

    Reply
  • June 14, 2011 at 11:57 pm
    Permalink

    Methinks the professor doth protesteth too much? Seriously, green-with-envy, you sound like the jilted lover who was left at the alter. Your supposed last ravings on Palin reveal much more about you than it does about her, such as its your mind that is diseased. Maybe you should join the other Weiner in some well deserved rehab.

    Reply
  • June 15, 2011 at 12:56 am
    Permalink

    It is professors & leftists like you that make me want to vote for Palin (if she announces). I would love it if she wins – just to hear all you commie leftists cry & moan for the duration of her terms. Please stop ruining our kids’ minds & our country. College, for the most part (not all degrees) is a waste of money. and this proves it.

    PS: Have you not read up lately on MMGW or is it Climate Change now? The scam has been uncovered …google it. LOL.

    Reply
  • June 15, 2011 at 2:26 am
    Permalink

    I am having the time of my life watching these America hating “educators” melting down over a woman who is a private citizen running for nothing.I can’t wait for the coming education bubble burst, when the rest of the country wakes up to the fact that most higher education is a waste of money,leaving the graduate jobless,indebt and brain washed.

    Reply
  • June 15, 2011 at 4:12 am
    Permalink

    Prof., Uber Libs like you express great concern for the common man, the problem is when you finally meet one your contempt for them comes through. The lotus eaters of academia know little beyond their snug little world. There is a world of people who work more than nine months out the year and do not work from the same lecture notes year after year. Out here you adapt daily or die. We can’t sit on our fat tenure each day. Only the anointed from the right families, right colleges and a respectable number of post graduate degrees makes one worthy in your eyes. I wear your contempt as a badge of honor.

    Reply
  • June 15, 2011 at 4:30 am
    Permalink

    I will make sure no one in my family or friends ever to attend this University, dont want to cryover ever having allowed my children in such a beast-brain-washed caricature.

    Reply
  • June 15, 2011 at 5:01 am
    Permalink

    Don’t be surprised…Palin’s flying monkeys got here first. We all know what that means. Just look at them & their comments. PS: don’t be surprised if you get death threats. They are as “threatening” to America as they were when Bristle was on DWTS.

    Reply
  • June 15, 2011 at 6:17 am
    Permalink

    speaking like a true republican would speak and yet they hate you for it.if hate were color blind and based solely on the words spoken the republicans would hate themselves and not know that its themselves they hate.when republicans feel fear they react with hate and with that they lose understanding and then people start dying to preserve want they feel is theirs and with that they lose more.i have no fears,life is good and i pray for you.

    Reply
    • June 15, 2011 at 11:31 pm
      Permalink

      Wrong. People start dying when leftists take control. Check your history.

      Reply
  • June 15, 2011 at 4:09 pm
    Permalink

    When I first began to read this I wondered who was so ill-informed and ill-educated and ill-iterate to write this?

    Then I got to the bottom and thought, “Oh, of course, that explains it”. More sewer leakage from the socialist faculty lounge.
    I’m not a big fan of Palin but geez, you ignorant libs are just amazing at the amount of hatred you can carry inside of yourselves for the America outside of your campus.

    Professewer Green: FAIL

    Reply
  • June 15, 2011 at 7:10 pm
    Permalink

    It is the politics of insecurity.

    It’s the politics of hate.

    It’s the politics of deceit.

    It’s the politics of hypocrisy.

    It’s the politics of laziness.

    It’s the politics of irresponsibility.

    It’s the politics of ignorance.

    It’s the politics of destruction.

    But, most of all, it is the politics of greed.

    Yes, it is. And that is exactly why you’re getting flamed here, Prof. No one is ever happy to hear negative truths about themselves. It’s much easier to cry “LIB” than to actually look at the bad joke your own political party has become over the past 10 years.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.