Indus Water Treaty And The Rule Based Order – OpEd
The suspension of the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT) by India is not merely a bilateral issue between New Delhi and Islamabad—it is a grave breach of international law, a reckless gamble with regional peace, and a direct threat to the global order of treaty-based diplomacy. India’s unilateral move to place the treaty “in abeyance” raises critical questions: Can any country be trusted to honor international agreements? Is the world prepared to condone treaty violations without accountability?
Signed in 1960 under the auspices of the World Bank, the Indus Waters Treaty has long been hailed as one of the most successful water-sharing agreements in history. It survived wars, border skirmishes, and political upheavals between India and Pakistan. Its durability was seen as a testament to rational diplomacy in one of the most volatile regions on Earth. However, India’s recent suspension of the treaty has now shattered that legacy and injected a new level of unpredictability into South Asian geopolitics.
The Indus Waters Treaty is not just a political agreement—it is a legally binding international treaty, registered with the United Nations. Article XII of the treaty clearly states that it cannot be altered or suspended unilaterally. By acting in defiance of this provision, India has committed a blatant violation of international law. This breach sets a dangerous precedent. If a rising global power like India can renege on an internationally recognized treaty without facing repercussions, what message does it send to other nations? That treaties are optional? That commitments enshrined under international oversight are no longer sacrosanct? This erosion of trust could have ripple effects on other global agreements—from climate change accords to arms control pacts—threatening the very fabric of cooperative international governance.
India’s actions have already triggered alarm bells across the world. Members of the UK House of Lords have issued stern warnings, highlighting the potential humanitarian catastrophe such a decision could unleash. Millions of Pakistanis depend on the waters flowing from India-administered territory for drinking, irrigation, and electricity. Disrupting these flows can have catastrophic effects on Pakistan’s food security, public health, and economy. Moreover, New Delhi’s decision has created anxiety in other regions where transboundary water treaties exist. China, for instance, is closely monitoring the developments. If India justifies unilateral action under vague political pretexts, what is to stop China from taking similar measures on shared rivers like the Brahmaputra? The principle of mutual respect and shared stewardship of transboundary resources is now under serious threat.
India’s suspension of the Indus Waters Treaty is not an isolated event. It fits a larger pattern of defiance and disregard for international norms. From its revocation of Article 370 in Jammu and Kashmir to its refusal to abide by WTO rulings on digital trade and agricultural subsidies, India is increasingly positioning itself above global frameworks.
The world must ask: Can India still be trusted to honor its treaties? Can we rely on a government that treats binding agreements as strategic levers rather than moral obligations? If the global community allows this to pass unchallenged, it will embolden other nations to pursue similar paths, leading to a cascading collapse of global trust. This is why the international community must act—and act decisively. The United Nations, the World Bank (a party to the IWT), and regional organizations like SAARC and the OIC must demand immediate reinstatement of the treaty’s obligations. Legal mechanisms must be explored to hold India accountable. At the very least, global powers must exert diplomatic pressure to ensure that India returns to the negotiating table.
Experts have long warned that future conflicts may be fought over water rather than oil or territory. India’s recklessness may be pushing South Asia toward that grim reality. With climate change exacerbating droughts, floods, and water shortages, cooperation over shared rivers is more critical than ever. Instead, India has chosen confrontation over collaboration.
India’s suspension of the Indus Waters Treaty must be treated as a wake-up call. It is a direct challenge to the integrity of international agreements and a harbinger of future geopolitical instability if left unchecked. If treaties can be broken at will, what becomes of diplomacy? What becomes of peace? The time to act is now. The world must not let treaty violations become normalized. Accountability must be enforced—not only to protect the rights of Pakistan but to preserve the sanctity of global commitments. India must be reminded that international law is not a tool of convenience—it is the cornerstone of global peace and cooperation.
Like what you read?
Please consider supporting Eurasia Review. Thank you for your consideration!
Indus Waters Treaty suspension is considered as direct challenge to the international agreements but proxy war through Terrorism in Kashmir is NOT?
If for Pakistan “Kashmir is Pakistan’s Jugular Vein” then it is in Pakistan’s best interest to foster good neighbourly relations. Maintaining peaceful ties with India would help ensure the continued and unhindered flow of these critical waters for the survival of their populace. The phrase “Kashmir Is Pakistan’s Jugular Vein” need to be change to “Indian Water is Pakistan’s Jugular Vein” and Not Kashmir. Pakistan needs to stop clinging to the outdated rhetorical metaphors and move forward with reality. The Indian rivers that flow into Pakistan should carry a message that “Indian Rivers Water of Peace shall flow as long as Pakistan behaves.
“India need NOT bleed Pakistan through war, but through the powerful lever in the flow of river waters. Once the flow of Indian rivers, Pakistan’s Jugular Vein, is Cut, the True Cry will be of Thirst, not Blood. Let there be No Bloodshed, only the silence of drying rivers and ‘Cry of Water’, for the “Indian Water is Pakistan’s Jugular Vein.”