ISSN 2330-717X

US Stagflation Is A Triple-Whammy By Fed, Biden White House And Big Defense – Analysis

By

Stagflation is no longer just a US recession threat, but global risk. It is the net effect of a triple-whammy that penalizes American welfare and global recovery. But it will not harm the profit margins of the defense contractors. 

Advertisement

Recently, President Biden admitted US inflation was stuck at “unacceptably high” levels after the annual rate in April soared to 8.3%. He blamed the Covid-19 pandemic and Russian President Putin for US price increases instead of his government spending. 

After four years of Trump devastation, the Biden administration had a historical opportunity to reset economic policies by nullifying the self-defeating trade wars, and geopolitics by redirecting military spending to welfare. Instead, the White House missed both opportunities. The net effect is the worst inflation in four decades that the Fed could turn into stagflation.

What went wrong?

The Fed’s mistakes: From inflation to stagflation

Since the onset of the pandemic, the Fed has made two mistakes. Ignoring the WHO’s warnings about the international spread of the Covid-19, it began to cut rates belatedly in March 2020. The Trump administration amplified the mistake by trying to protect US equity market at the expense of American people. 

The second mistake ensued after mid-year 2021, when inflation started to climb rapidly. Instead of a timely response, the Fed chairman Jerome Powell characterized rising prices as “transitionary.” By December, inflation soared 7% from a year ago; and in March, 8.5%; a 41-year high. In early May, the Fed lifted its benchmark interest rate to a range of 0.75%-1%, after a smaller hike in March. It was the Fed’s biggest increase in 22 years. In April, inflation slowed to 8.3%, but less than market forecasts (Figure 1). 

Advertisement

Figure 1 How the Fed missed the galloping inflation

The Fed is also planning quantitative tightening (QT) andwill start culling assets from its $9 trillion balance sheet in June. It will do so at nearly twice the pace it did in its previous QT. Responding belatedly, it is overshooting. Hence, the concern with stagflation: rising prices coupled with economic stagnation. 

The Biden administration’s mistakes: Commodity and energy shocks      

Commodity prices have soared 45 percent since the beginning of the year and remain close to the peak level. So do the food prices, which climbed to an all-time high in March, up nearly 20 percent year-on-year. UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres called it the “hurricane of hunger and a meltdown of the global food system.” 

Crude oil prices soared to a high of $125 in early March, increasing 43 percent since January, and remain $113. In Europe, the most exposed region to Russian energy, natural gas price quintupled to a high of 230 euros and has dropped to 96 euros, as concerns over Russian supplies have dissipated somewhat, for now (Figure 2). Hence, the recession threat hanging over the Euro Area. And if the proxy war takes an adverse turn once again, so will the commodity and energy prices soar again. 

Figure 2 Energy and food shocks

Commodity Index (S&P GSCI); food prices: UN/FAO food price index; oil: Crude oil (WTI); natural gas (EU Dutch TTF), May 17, 2022 
Source: Tradingeconomics; Difference Group

A benign scenario in the Ukrainian crisis would have required rapid, proactive diplomacy. But that hasn’t been a priority in the proxy war. As US defense secretary Lloyd Austin acknowledged in late April: “We want to see Russia weakened.” 

Russia is the world’s 11th largest, $1.8 trillion economy, the world’s largest gas exporter and second-largest crude oil exporter. Neither the protracted Ukraine crisis nor the weaponization of sanctions will advance peace. But both will penalize global recovery.

As some US policymakers are calling for tariff reductions in order to provide relief to consumers struggling with soaring prices, the Biden administration is reviewing tariffs imposed on Chinese products ahead of their expiration in July. With the plunge of Biden’s ratings, the Democrats are struggling to avoid a Republican triumph in the fall election.

Despite the hopes of the Trump and Biden administration, the US trade tariff wars have failed to reduce the deficit. Unilateral trade actions do not resolve multilateral trade challenges. In effect, the deficit widened sharply to a record high of $110 billion in March, due to a broad-based rise in prices (Figure 3). 

Figure 3 Despite trade wars and pandemics, record-high US trade deficit

Source: BEA; Tradingeconomics; Difference Group, May 17, 2022

Pentagon’s mistakes: Collusion with Big Defense 

The architect of president Biden’s geopolitics in Asia is Kurt Campbell, a veteran diplomat and CEO of the Asia Group LLC. In January 2021, his appointment unleashed a public debate in the US, due to Campbell’s portfolio of ex-clients rife with potential conflicts of interests. According to his own disclosures, the key clients include leading defense contractors. As critics see it, “shadow lobbying” outfits, like Campbell’s firm, call themselves consultants to avoid restrictions associated with traditional lobbying. 

Campbell is not alone. Secretary of state Antony Blinken and national security adviser Jake Sullivan were in similar firms, which led to similar debates. And before presiding over the Pentagon, secretary of defense Lloyd Austin served on the board of Raytheon, a major defense contractor. 

What makes Campbell different is that he predominates US policy-making in Asia. 

Moreover, in November 2021, Biden nominated Fed governor Lael Brainard to serve as its vice chair. With the confirmation of her appointment, Brainard’s dovish views have shifted. Now she is pushing rapid rate hikes. Brainard is an accomplished veteran Democrat, like her husband – Kurt Campbell.

So, in addition to Campbell’s alleged conflicts of interests, the husband-wife linkage reinforces critics’ perceptions of tacit collusions in the decision-making by the executive branch, monetary chiefs, capital markets, Pentagon and the Big Defense. 

Since the Obama administration, the White House has promoted a “pivot to Asia,” a doctrine which is premised on US military might and is very much in line with the interests of the Big Defense. Its architect just happens to be Campbell as well. 

———–

Among other collateral damage, inflation, has contributed to the excesses of US housing market, which keeps it out of reach for many ordinary Americans. By contrast, defense contractors are prime beneficiaries of inflation, due to the increased defense budgets, including the use of inflation as an excuse to price-gouge.

It is thus only prudent to wonder whether Campbell’s pivot is less motivated by American welfare and US national interest than by the Pentagon’s revolving-door practices and defense contractors’ fat margins. 

The first version of the column was published by China Daily on May 19, 2022

Dan Steinbock

Dr Dan Steinbock is an recognized expert of the multipolar world. He focuses on international business, international relations, investment and risk among the leading advanced and large emerging economies. He is a Senior ASLA-Fulbright Scholar (New York University and Columbia Business School). Dr Dan Steinbock is an internationally recognized expert of the multipolar world. He focuses on international business, international relations, investment and risk among the major advanced economies (G7) and large emerging economies (BRICS and beyond). Altogether, he monitors 40 major world economies and 12 strategic nations. In addition to his advisory activities, he is affiliated with India China and America Institute (USA), Shanghai Institutes for International Studies (China) and EU Center (Singapore). As a Fulbright scholar, he also cooperates with NYU, Columbia University and Harvard Business School. He has consulted for international organizations, government agencies, financial institutions, MNCs, industry associations, chambers of commerce, and NGOs. He serves on media advisory boards (Fortune, Bloomberg BusinessWeek, McKinsey).

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.