Indian Educational Reforms: Post-1986 Status And Challenges – OpEd


After the National Policy of Education implemented in 1986, 1992 educational reforms in India, were influenced by both domestic and global factors. While these reforms were primarily designed to address the specific challenges within India’s education system, they were also influenced by broader global trends and aspirations for aligning the country’s education system with international standards whose aspects include:

a. Globalization and Economic Competitiveness: The early 1990s marked a period of globalization, with increased international trade and economic integration. To remain competitive in the global economy, India recognized the need to produce a skilled and educated workforce. The 1992 reforms emphasized the importance of education in preparing students for global competitiveness by focusing on quality and relevance.

b. Technology Integration: The 1990s saw rapid advancements in information technology and the growing importance of computer literacy worldwide. The reforms acknowledged the need to integrate technology into the education system, aligning with global trends in digital education and preparing students for a technology-driven world.

c. Curricular Relevance: The emphasis on a revised and updated curriculum aimed to make education more relevant to the needs of students and society. This trend mirrored international efforts to shift from rote learning to more student-centered and holistic approaches to education.

d. Vocational Education and Skill Development: The integration of vocational education programs into the education system aligned with the global recognition of the importance of practical skills and vocational training in preparing students for a wide range of careers.

e. Inclusivity and Gender Parity: Globally, there was a growing emphasis on achieving gender equality in education. The 1992 reforms in India reflected this global concern by promoting girls’ education and reducing gender disparities.

f.  International Benchmarks: India looked to international benchmarks and best practices in education for inspiration and guidance. The desire to align its education policies with international standards reflected a commitment to global educational excellence.

g. Globalization of Higher Education: With globalization, there was also a growing trend of Indian students seeking higher education opportunities abroad. The reforms aimed to prepare students for international educational opportunities by enhancing the quality of education. In conclusion, while these reforms had a domestic focus on addressing specific challenges within India, they were also aligned with global aspirations for quality, relevance, and inclusivity in education.

Background of 1992 reforms

The key aspects of the background are:

a. Economic Reforms and Globalization: In the late 1980s and early 1990s, India initiated a series of economic reforms aimed at liberalizing its economy and integrating into the global market. This economic liberalization created a demand for a more skilled and educated workforce to compete in the globalized world. As a result, there was a growing realization that the education system needed to adapt to meet the needs of a changing economy.

b. Educational Shortcomings: The existing education system in India faced various challenges and shortcomings. These included disparities in access to education, a rote-learning-oriented curriculum, a lack of emphasis on practical skills and vocational education, and issues related to the quality of education and teacher training.

c. Demographic Pressures: India’s population was growing rapidly, and there was an increasing demand for education at all levels. This demographic pressure necessitated a re-evaluation of educational policies and strategies to ensure that a growing population had access to quality education.

d. Global Education Trends: India looked to global education trends and best practices for inspiration. The country sought to align its education policies with international standards to improve the quality of education and make it more relevant to global requirements.

e. Political Changes: The early 1990s saw changes in the political landscape in India. The National Front government, led by Prime Minister P.V. Narasimha Rao, took office in 1991 and played a crucial role in initiating the education reforms. The government appointed a committee, chaired by Acharya Ramamurti, to draft the National Policy on Education, which was eventually released in 1992.

f. Public Demand for Reform: There was a growing public demand for educational reform, and various stakeholders, including educators, policymakers, and civil society organizations, called for changes in the education system to better serve the needs of the country. 

Objectives of 1992 reforms

The primary objectives of these reforms included:

a. Universalization of Elementary Education: The foremost objective was to ensure that every child in the age group of 6 to 14 years had access to and received quality elementary education. This aimed to eliminate disparities in enrolment and retention rates among different social and economic groups.

b. Curriculum Reform: The reforms aimed to update and revise the curriculum to make it more relevant and meaningful.

c. Vocational Education: Encouraging vocational education and skill development was another objective. The reforms sought to integrate vocational education programs into the mainstream education system to prepare students for various career options.

d.  Decentralization: The reforms aimed to decentralize education management and decision-making. They promoted greater autonomy at the local level, allowing communities and schools to have more control over educational matters.

e. Adult Education: The reforms recognized the importance of adult education for the empowerment of marginalized and underprivileged populations. They aimed to provide literacy and skills training to adults who had missed out on formal education.

f. Teacher Training and Professional Development: Improving the quality of teacher education and enhancing the skills and professionalism of teachers was a central objective. This included reforming teacher training programs and providing ongoing professional development opportunities.

g. Technology Integration: The reforms acknowledged the potential of technology in education and aimed to integrate it into the teaching-learning process. This included the introduction of computer education in schools.

h. Financial Support: Adequate financial support from both the central and state governments was emphasized to implement these reforms effectively. Funding was essential to improve infrastructure, teacher salaries, and educational resources.

i. Special Focus on Weaker Sections: The reforms recognized the need to address the educational needs of socially and economically disadvantaged groups and minorities, with a focus on inclusive education.

These objectives were designed to transform the education system in India and bring about positive changes in access, quality, and relevance of education. However, it’s important to note that the implementation of these objectives has faced various challenges and progress has been uneven across different states in India. Subsequent policies and initiatives have built upon these objectives to further improve the education system in the country.

Dr. Rajkumar Singh

Dr. Rajkumar Singh is a University Professor for the last 20 years and presently Head of the P.G. Department of Political Science, B.N. Mandal University, West Campus, P.G. Centre,Saharsa (Bihar), India. In addition to 17 books published so far there are over 250 articles to his credit out of which above 100 are from 30 foreign countries. His recent published books include Transformation of modern Pak Society-Foundation, Militarisation, Islamisation and Terrorism (Germany, 2017),and New Surroundings of Pak Nuclear Bomb (Mauritius, 2018). He is an authority on Indian Politics and its relations with foreign countries.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *