A South China Sea US Warship Route – Analysis


If US navy ships traverse the South China Sea to demonstrate freedom of navigation, what route might they take?

One route could be a broad arc passing near Reed Bank as well as Subi and Mischief reefs. This would establish an important precedent in the most contentious areas of the South China Sea.

It would also demonstrate China’s diplomatic isolation as the only nation likely to protest.

China claims virtually the entire South China Sea as ‘indisputable’ Chinese territory. China says it plans to ignore any international rulings that decide otherwise.

The US, along with all the South China Sea’s other littoral nations, reject China’s position.

The result of this disagreement between China and her neighbors has been testy encounters at sea — particularly between China, the Philippines and Vietnam. China’s construction of military facilities on Subi, Mischief and Fiery Cross reefs (among others) increasingly worry her neighbors.

In mid-May, the Chinese navy ordered a US military reconnaissance flight away from Chinese claimed islands. The US ignored the order — claiming its flight path was in international airspace. The US may now underscore the point by sending US navy ships through the South China Sea to emphasize the principle of free maritime navigation.

If the US does so, the disputed Reed Bank — claimed by both China and the Philippines —is an excellent first stop on the tour. Reed Bank contains the South China Sea’s most promising as-yet undeveloped oil and gas fields.

China and the Philippines already have engaged in dangerous skirmishes at Reed Bank as both conduct hydrographic research to better estimate the energy resource. This lifts the veil of principled subterfuge by all sides in the South China Sea. It shows the real issue lurking underneath.

South China Sea territorial claims — at least in Reed Bank — is really about energy.

If all sides recast dangerous nationalistic posturing to more hard-headed economic calculation, it opens the way for more rational, mutual gain negotiations. These could center upon joint development of South China Sea resources. This, as an alternative to war.

Nowhere at present offers the same opportunity as Reed Bank for rational thinking to prevail.

Consider the below:

Philippine-listed energy exploration company Philex Petroleum Corp. has engaged in on-and-off talks for years now with China National Offshore Oil Company (CNOOC) on joint exploration and development of Reed Bank. The specific focus has been on Service Contract 72 (SC72), located in the Sampaguita Field in the southern part of Reed Bank.

These stalled Philex-CNOOC talks suggest political interference. Should China and the Philippines negotiate seriously, the specifics of a deal are easy to imagine.

Joint exploration and development of Sampaguita’s SC72 could yield natural gas supplies that could be pumped to Luzon through extending the existing gas pipeline serving the mature Malampaya pipeline just to Sampaguita’s northeast.

Needed investment in jointly developing SC72 could be funded by loans from the China-based Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB), of which the Philippines is a founding member.

CNOOC could share in the proceeds of Philippine domestic sales of natural gas from Sampaguita. Joint development also would enable CNOOC to demonstrate a cooperative working relationship with a Philippine counterparty in the natural gas industry.

This could follow up Chinese state champion State Grid Corp. of China’s successful 25-year contract to upgrade and manage the Philippine electricity grid through the Chinese-Philippine joint venture National Grid Corp. of the Philippines.

That Philippine contract has provided major demonstration for State Grid. It almost certainly contributed to State Grid’s subsequent successful entries into other overseas markets such Australia, Italy and Brazil.

The economic bargain of China’s infrastructure ‘going out’ efforts is clear to see. China provides recipient countries with investment capital and world class Chinese infrastructure. China, in turn, benefits from gaining a crucial economic ‘relief valve’ that helps maintain employment in China’s now huge infrastructure industry.

China’s infrastructure industry is now one of the nation’s largest employers, employing roughly three percent of the workforce. That makes it a bigger employer — by far — than the People’s Liberation Army, which employs about two percent of the workforce..

Keeping this civilian infrastructure workforce employed is now critically important for China. It presents the classic ‘bicycle dilemma’ — keep peddling or fall off. Viewed this way, China’s AIIB-funded overseas infrastructure investment can be seen as a sign of Chinese mercantile weakness than economic strength.

If countries come to mistrust China, it will immensely complicate efforts of State Grid, CNOOC and other Chinese state champions to win overseas infrastructure projects. Should this occur, layoffs may follow. This may strain China’s brittle internal social contract of higher living standards in return for stifled civil society.

Given this, China needs overseas infrastructure contracts as much as — and potentially more — than recipient countries. These must now worry about turning over critical infrastructure to a country with potentially expanding ‘indisputable’ claims.

Given the above, providing access to international infrastructure projects critical to maintaining internal Chinese social stability has now become a key — but under-recognized — point of leverage for recipient countries.

A US navy flotilla tour of the South China Sea may demonstrate to China that the ‘going out’ strategy of its world-class economic infrastructure industry may now be at risk from her South China Sea territorial claims.

Creating Joint Development Zones in the South China Sea finesses this problem. It kicks territorial finality down the road to a time when the stakes are lower because the energy resources have been developed. It also shows flexibility and a willingness to compromise. This raises trust.

Reed Bank offers such a potential outcome. It provides CNOOC, Philex and SC72 a chance to ‘get it right.’

A US flotilla tour could provide the opportunity to demonstrate the potential.

Stewart Taggart

A former economic and energy market journalist in the United States, Western Europe and Asia, Stewart is the founder and principal of Grenatec. Sydney-based Grenatec is a research organization studying the viability of a Pan-Asia Energy Infrastructure. This infrastructure would be comprised of parallel natural gas pipelines, high capacity power lines and fiber optics cables stretching from Australia to China, Japan and South Korea.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *