The Mangi Dam Attack And The New Architecture Of Networked Militancy – OpEd

Key Takeaways:

  • The Mangi Dam police post attack was a deliberate strike on a strategic security node, killing at least 27 officers and aiming to undermine state authority, water security and public confidence in Balochistan.
  • Pakistan faces a networked militant ecosystem (TTP, BLA and affiliates) that exploits Afghan sanctuaries and shared tactics, requiring coordinated intelligence, international pressure and disruption of financing rather than treating groups in isolation.
  • Effective response combines kinetic operations (such as Operation Shaban), stronger infrastructure protection, religious scholarly rejection of terrorism (Paigham-e-Pakistan), and community resilience so that violence yields neither refuge nor political reward.

The attacks on the police post near Mangi Dam in Ziarat was not just another incident in Pakistan’s fight against terrorism. It befell the design of protection and security; the policemen who guarded a strategic nearby region, the inhabitants who relied upon the state for protection, and a water facility that supplied the water to Quetta and local residents. The Associated Press reports that nine of the police officers were killed in the initial attack and 18 abductive officers were also later discovered dead. It was meant to instil fear in families, disrespect local institutions and show that the rule of law is not the final arbiter of life and death, but the will of armed groups. 

The Mangi assault has a strategic significance in the location. The security, water governance, transport and public confidence nexus is at police post close to a dam. Militants are trying to coerce the state out of the periphery, and in doing so are launching an assault on such a node – coercive governance. The absence of police mobility leads to a lack of tourists, construction slows down, public services are more expensive, and communities are more susceptible to kidnapping, extortion and propaganda. In this attack, the uniformed personnel were not just attacked but, the right of the people to water security, economic activity and predictable law.

New data is now available to shed some light on the magnitude of the danger. Thirty-seven militant attacks took place in the country in the last week (3-9), killing 108 people, according to the weekly security review of the PICSS. The attacks and deaths in Balochistan amounted to 25 and 102, respectively. After a highly violent year in 2025, with Pakistan experiencing 3,413 combat deaths, 667 of which were by security forces and 580 were civilians, Pakistan has already begun 2026. Each year, the Global Terrorism Index is therefore released with Pakistan being the most affected country by terrorism in 2025. 

Afghanistan’s sanctuaries are said to be used by the BLA and TTP and also receive support by the Indians, which Pakistan has accused, but Kabul and New Delhi have denied. There is a need for Pakistan to neither ignore any suspicious pattern nor just take on the word of people. Evidence should be compiled into financial and communications intercepts, weapons-origin, travel and facilitator-identification dossiers for use in diplomatic and multilateral forums. Strategically, attribution also becomes useful when it has the potential to have legal, financial and political ramifications against sponsors/ facilitators. 

The greater peril is militancy with network connections. While the BLA had an ideology of separatism, the TTP had a radical religious agenda, there is no need for ideology to match tactics in order to cooperate. Groups can exchange infiltration routes, intelligence, explosives knowledge, media amplification and safe spaces and work toward various political goals. The addition of BLA and Majeed Brigade to the U.S. FTO list further extends the international support to hinder their funding and the listing of the TTP in the UN Security Council’s TTP list further solidifies the group’s status in the global sanction’s regime. But Pakistan cannot deal with the militants as individual groups, it is necessary to address an interconnected militant ecosystem. 

Muslim militants, who use Islam as a pretext for killing, not only do a crime against humanity but an intellectual fraud on Islam also. The consensus Paigham-e-Pakistan, supported by 1829 scholars from various schools of thought, declared suicide bombing as forbidden, looked at the issue of armed Jihad with the perspective of Islamic state and rejected armed violence in the name of religion. Suicide attack is also banned by the national narrative of NACTA and it stresses the sanctity of innocent life. The killing of policemen, execution of captives and destruction of essential infrastructure are Muslims’ crimes on earth, which are called Fasad fi al-ard (violent corruption on earth).

This propaganda also has a negative impact on Muslims around the world. Each of the warped verses, invented religious jargon and filmed executions gives Islamophobes something to spin a yarn about a religion that teaches about the importance of justice, refraining from evil and caring for the innocent. Religious literacy and quick repudiation of messages and credible local counterterrorism experts who can expose the doctrinal bankruptcy of militant messages are therefore a part of the counterterrorism equation. Both the theological and information war has to be fought and the extremes avoided.

The State was able to respond and had the will, as shown in Operation Shaban. The number of terrorists ended up being more than 75, with the figure being exceeded by July 13. The Dawn has cited the latest state-supplied data that Operation Shaban had killed 79 people in particular and “other intelligence-based operations” in Balochistan have resulted in the elimination of 117 Balochistan terrorists since July 5. It was a co-ordinated effort by Pakistan Army, Frontier Corps and Balochistan Police, which clearly showed that it wasn’t just a spasm of temporary retaliation. 

The Mangi martyrs need to be remembered and compensated for, but they should be remembered in a manner that includes enhancing intelligence sharing, bolstering police posts, monitoring access to mountain regions, protecting water, energy and transport infrastructure, and providing increased protection. It is not a body count that is the final measure of success, it is when citizens are able to travel, work, study and use public services without fear. The brutalisation of the protectors by the militants has been revealed by Mangi dam, but it has also shown the weakness of the militants: they can come up and kill the protectors, but they can’t make up the legality. Peace will reign when communities, police, religious scholars and state institutions are united so that every sponsor of violence, facilitator of violence, and executioner learns that there is no refuge or political reward for violence.

About Dr. Sahibzada Muhammad Usman

Dr. Sahibzada Muhammad Usman holds a PhD (Italy) in geopolitics and is currently doing a Postdoctoral Fellowship at Shandong University, China. Dr. Usman is the author of a book titled ‘Different Approaches on Central Asia: Economic, Security, and Energy’, published by Lexington, USA.

View all posts by Dr. Sahibzada Muhammad Usman →

Get the Eurasia Review newsletter

Selected analysis, news, and opinion delivered by email.

Like what you read?

Please consider supporting Eurasia Review. Thank you for your consideration!

Dr. Sahibzada Muhammad Usman

Dr. Sahibzada Muhammad Usman holds a PhD (Italy) in geopolitics and is currently doing a Postdoctoral Fellowship at Shandong University, China. Dr. Usman is the author of a book titled ‘Different Approaches on Central Asia: Economic, Security, and Energy’, published by Lexington, USA.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *