By Sharique Naeem
As the Arab spring continues to unfold, each event, is being analyzed closely by Politicians, Journalists, and Intellectuals both in the west and the east.
The developments which commenced with the events in Tunisia, and later gripped the entire region, brought a significant potential for change, as it has shaken the political construct of the region. It has without a doubt been historic to witness the way the masses have stood up to account and remove long standing dictatorships.
In the immediate aftermath of some revolutions, a move towards Democracy has taken place. However the litmus test for its sustainability is yet to produce results. Key questions now are will the new fragile democracies be able to deliver and adequately fill the void or even gain mass acceptance?
It is important to note, that the uprisings were initiated and acquired appeal, due to a number of key ingredients. Lack of political expression, iron first dictatorships, sheer economic marginalization of the poor, corruption and exploitation by the ruling class (which was essential the dictator’s extended family) and unpopular foreign policies were among the variables which had propelled the masses to stand up. The new ‘democratic’ governments in Tunisia, Libya and Egypt, for now only address a fraction of the many underlying reasons. Expectations for real change run high, and any new government will be expected to deliver fast for the masses, which are politically more awakened, and politically active. While few variables have been addressed, other key variables remain, and have even worsened. The fulfillment of a part of one variable, such as more rights for political expression, does not resolve the other variables, such as the economic problems, which have worsened over the last year. The ability of the new democracies, or the lack of it, is the litmus test for the regions political construct. The credibility of the new governments will erode fast, if it’s unable to address the core issues; and this may create more acceptance for alternative political models such as the Caliphate, which appears to be gaining some limelight. The extent to which this idea of Caliphate, carries appeal, can be observed by following the news from the Arab world. A key senior politician from Nahda Party, during campaign in Tunisia, had stated of his hope to see a ‘Sixth Caliphate’, and at a rally of Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, Egyptian Cleric Safwat Higazi had stated the ambition of a ‘Caliphate’ uniting everyone. Moreover at the start of the Syrian uprising, Bashar Asad, had tried to garner support from west, by framing the uprising as a move for establishing a Caliphate, and blaming a group of Palestinian origin, ‘Libration Party’ for it.
In Post-Arab spring, countries like Libya are also facing the issue of growing political voices, which pose the possibility of fragmenting the nation and weakening the grip of the central government. For instances, a few months back, some circles in Eastern Libya had made calls to declare independence. The government in Yemen too is facing a host of issues too, and the constant stream of drone attacks continue to weaken the credibility of the Government. The recent border tensions, in Egypt, and the Air raids carried on Sinai will also fan more issues.
These internal divisions, undermine the authority of the central government, as well as the integrity of the existing nation states. However, a historical perspective of the region can give us some insight on these trends. For centuries the political construct that unified these regions was the Caliphate. It was the demise of Caliphate that fragmented the region. The transition from Caliphate to the model of Nation-states was not a natural outcome of a struggle of the host population. Foreign intervention, directly and indirectly, along with other factors had led to the fracture of the region. The Sykes Pecot agreement of 1916 is one such example. The nation-state model, that took shape when the foreign intervention was rolled back, required dictators to keep in place.
An important observation in this regard, is also noted by Samuel P. Huntington in his book ‘The Clash of Civilizations’ (1996) where he states:
“The structure of political loyalty among Arab and Muslims generally has been the opposite of that in the modern West. For the latter the nation state has been the apex of political loyalty”. He further explains ““Throughout Islam, the small group and the great faith, the tribe and the Ummah, have been the principal foci of loyalty and commitment. And the nation state has been less significant.” … “In the Arab world, existing states have legitimacy problems because they are for the most part the arbitrary, if not capricious, products of European Imperialism”.
Therefore, today, it’s not just the sustainability of democratic governments, that is in question, but also the political construct of nation-states.
In the scenario today, we again find foreign intervention to support and sustain the political model of democracy, as a replacement of the political model of dictatorship which was propped up decades earlier.
If the new ‘democracies’ fail to fill the political void, and address the grievances of the masses, the region is likely to witness two trends side by side: emboldened political expression on tribal, fragmented lines, and growing calls for transnational unity enroute an Islamic State. And both essentially negate unity along the line of nation-states.
If we were to objectively evaluate the various news from the Muslim world. For instance the videos coming from Syria, that show how central Islam is to the revolution and the growing calls for Islamic law in post-revolution Arab states. Also, Morsi’s victory in Egypt manifests this growing desire of people to see a greater role of Islam in politics. The overall trend is evident, and that is the rise of political Islam
Before the advent of the Arab spring (or Islamic awakening as some refer to it) The regional ‘Domino effect’ of the emergence of an Islamic State was a hypothesis. However, the events in ME, have added sound credibility to it. Just like a sheer negation of an existing political setup, having reached at its zenith had an immediate and profound domino effect, starting from Tunisia, and then moving to Egypt, Libya, Syria and Yemen etc; likewise the affirmation of a new political construct in any one place, has the ability to spread far quicker. Especially if this political construct, emanates from the ideology of the masses, has historic significance, is able to show instant results in addressing some of the core issues of the people, and exhibit the potential to solve other various standing issues. And although some friction may be expected when the existing states begin to merge, by large the Caliphate may well be able to galvanize a significant portion of the region by channeling popular support from masses, without the need of a series of regional wars.
Today, a number of countries, including Tunisia, Egypt and Pakistan may be speculated to be a potential launch pad for Caliphate. Some key factors that would be necessary for such a leadership are: the geo-strategic location of the country, the strength of its army, its population count, the extent of its integration with neighboring nation states etc. Since such a leadership would require to be able to immediately muster internal as well as regional support.
Syria, where the revolution has entered its 2nd year, may well provide that leadership. The news coming from Syria, evidently show the uniqueness of the revolution that is, the centrality of Islam, as a driving force and an objective, which is evident from slogans, titles of Friday demonstrations, speeches of defected soldiers etc.
Moreover, the fact that other revolutions have at present, culminated into democracies, with no real change on the grass root other than acquiring more rights of political expression and voting. The limited rights gained too are limited as is evident from what the protestors continue to face in Cairo, the ban in Libya on parties based on religion, and inflation and price hikes in Tunisia. This may well serve as a lesson to those spearheading the revolution in Syria, not to opt for futile democracy.
Quite clearly, beyond the Arab spring, is an Islamic awakening, that may well materialized into a political model which once unified the region for centuries previously, the Caliphate.
Sharique Naeem writes on issues of politics and current affairs of the Muslim world. He writes from Pakistan. His writings have been published in newspapers in Pakistan, India, Bangladesh, Yemen, Libya & Iran. He can be reached at [email protected]
Please Donate Today
Did you enjoy this article? Then please consider donating today to ensure that Eurasia Review can continue to be able to provide similar content.