ISSN 2330-717X

Trade Wars Threaten Food Security To Detriment Of Poor – OpEd

By

By Dr. Mukhisa Kituyi*

International trade has proven to be a critical mechanism for growth and development. It helps build stronger value chains, mitigate conflict and provides access to higher quality and quantities of goods and services.

It has also provided consumers with access to a more diversified and nutritious food basket. However, for trade to improve food security to the greatest number of people across the globe, greater international cooperation is necessary.

More than 820 million people – equivalent to more than 10% of the world’s population – were hungry and about 2 billion people experienced food insecurity in 2018.

This challenge exists in the context of a global population that is projected to grow from the current 7.7 billion to 8.5 billion in 2030 and rise to 9.7 billion in 2050.

The majority of those facing hunger and food insecurity live in developing countries. These countries, including many least developed countries (LDCs), depend critically on the agricultural sector for employment, production and exports.

For instance, 57% of the labour force in LDCs was employed in agriculture in 2019, compared with only 3% in high-income countries. Within developing countries, poverty is higher in rural areas and the rural poor depend on agriculture.

Smallholders in developing countries face challenges that preclude them from benefitting fairly from global value chains.

Enhanced international and national measures on transparency and regulation are needed to ensure incomes arising from agriculture value chains are fairly shared by all actors.

We also need improved market access and risk management tools for smallholder farmers, including for female farmers, to expand opportunities and reduce income volatility.

More inclusion needed

The international agricultural trading system needs to become less distorted, more inclusive and sustainable, as well as take the specific needs of developing countries into account.

The high volume of agricultural subsidies given to producers in developed countries must be reduced. For instance, OECD countries provided US$315 billion worth of support and protection for their agricultural producers in 2017.

Instead of improving fair and transparent market access, growing anti-globalization sentiments and moves towards protectionism threaten to undermine the substantial benefits of global trade, particularly for food systems and nutrition.

At the same time, anti-globalization and protectionist approaches do nothing to address the problems they claim to respond to.

For example, what began as heated rhetoric over trade between the United States and China has evolved into a potential trade war, with negotiations foundering and both countries proposing trade barriers.

This environment is likely to make it more difficult to overcome barriers to the improvement of global trade.

The collapse of agriculture negotiations has tremendously limited the scope for the use of trade for development and developing countries’ optimism about the potential of agricultural trade as a vehicle out of poverty is eroding.

Adequate multilateral trade negotiations would have led to substantial gains for both developing and developed countries, including increased global production of food and industrial goods, better trade infrastructure, more efficient customs procedures, lower tariff protection, and reduced production- and trade-distorting domestic support policies.

Trade agreements on agriculture also go far beyond food security – the special and differential treatment called for by developing countries on agriculture are a key requirement for them to continue to want to support the global trading regime in all sectors.

We also need stronger market information and reduced trade costs associated with non-tariff barriers to agricultural trade, including those measures that are more important today in light of the sustainability imperative.

The proliferation of non-tariff measures needs to be addressed and the costs of compliance with them brought down to ensure poorer countries benefit from market access for their agricultural products.

A proliferation of these measures is conceivable as countries develop and in the context of the implementation of 2030 Agenda.

To avoid potential adverse and unintended effects of this trend, policy coherence and convergence are essential. Traceability compliance must be sensible and support development.

These instruments, and the multilateral approach as a whole, provide important advantages for trade liberalization and should continue to be supported.

The role of trade in reducing hunger and ensuring food security must be prioritized. To do so, we must enhance international cooperation on a multilateral scale.

*Dr. Mukhisa Kituyi, UNCTAD Secretary-General

This viewpoint first appeared on UNCTAD website on 22 January 2020. 



Please Donate Today
Did you enjoy this article? Then please consider donating today to ensure that Eurasia Review can continue to be able to provide similar content.

IDN

IDN

IDN-InDepthNews offers news analyses and viewpoints on topics that impact the world and its peoples. IDN-InDepthNews serves as flagship of the International Press Syndicate Group, partner of the Global Cooperation Council.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.