ISSN 2330-717X

India Media And Anna Hazare Movement: Points For Action – OpEd

By

From “Dawn” of August 20,2011 on Karachi: “Anchors are seizing on it all, flogging the machinations to shore up flagging ratings.”

“Anything will be discussed, anything is fair game, as long as it doesn’t add up to informed or meaningful debate.”

” Informed, meaningful debate isn’t good for ratings.”So says “Dawn” on TV coverage of Karachi.

Equally valid for Indian TV coverage of the Anna Hazare (AH) movement. A well-known columnist has compared the TV coverage of AH to its coverage of the Kandahar hijacking in 1999.

Anna Hazare
Anna Hazare

Creating illusions and street hysteria. Karan Thapar pointed out last night that Times Now reported that there were over 100,000 outside Tihar whereas the number could not have been more than 20,000.There is a need for a more critical focus on the role of the TV.

Unfortunately, Doordarshan (DD) has not risen to the occasion and made an impact as a public service TV channel.

DD has totally surrendered the field to private channels. DD’s coverage of the parliamentary debate was the best, but nobody noticed it.

PM and others should make greater use of DD to disseminate their point of view and project their ideas & let private channels pick up from DD.

Goverment should set up a group of journalists for a critical analysis of the role of the TV.

Twitter should be extensively used by the Prime Minister’s Office (PMO) to disseminate Government’s views. Start today. Start Now.

We neglected media during Kandahar. Paid a price. Repeating the mistake now. Shed the diffidence. Choose the right persons as spokesmen.

Interact with media freely, frankly, trustingly & without complexes. Distrust begets distrust.

B. Raman

B. Raman

B. Raman (August 14, 1936 – June 16, 2013) was Additional Secretary (retd), Cabinet Secretariat, Govt. of India, New Delhi, and Director, Institute For Topical Studies, Chennai and Associate, Chennai Centre For China Studies.

One thought on “India Media And Anna Hazare Movement: Points For Action – OpEd

  • Avatar
    August 24, 2011 at 4:13 pm
    Permalink

    Anna’s bill is easy to understand it shows loyality & transperency abt nation.where as gvt. bill shows ,hame openly currption karne do. gvt.is not ready for that three term bcoz they want to get money from junior employee.goom firke. ye baat hovi ki hame nichese to paisa lene do.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.