ISSN 2330-717X

India – Pakistan Relations And Kayani’s Smile: How Genuine?

By

During a visit to the site of the devastating avalanche near Skardu in Pakistan-Occupied Gilgit-Baltistan (GB) on April 18,2012,which killed about 125 military personnel and 15 civilians, Gen. Ashfaq Pervez Kayani, Pakistan’s Chief of the Army Staff (COAS), is reported to have made — for the first time since he took over as the COAS from Gen. Pervez Musharraf — some positive references to India.

The Pakistani media has quoted him as saying as follows: “Peaceful coexistence between the two neighbours is very important so that everybody can concentrate on the well-being of the people…… The decades of enmity between India and Pakistan should be resolved through negotiation.”

Pakistan - India Relations
Pakistan - India Relations

It needs to be underlined that these remarks should not be interpreted as indicating a change in the hostile mindset of the Pakistan Army towards India. Nor do they indicate a definitive desire of the Pakistan Army for a thaw in Indo-Pakistan relations.

These remarks were made by Gen. Kayani in the context of the tragedy caused by the avalanche and were apparently designed to prod the international community to revive pressure on India to reach a mutually satisfactory agreement with Pakistan on the Siachen issue that could lead to a mutual withdrawal of troops from the glacier.

Pakistan is paying a heavier price than India in Siachen in terms of financial and human costs. Moreover, signs of alienation among the Shia population of GB have been increasing steadily. The fact that the majority of those who perished in the avalanche were from GB — possibly Shias — and that none of them could be rescued has added to the anger against the Army in the area.

Talk on the urgent need for a stand alone Siachen agreement with India is, therefore, assuming a desperate urgency for Pakistan. Kayani has to respond to this desperation if he has to prevent a further erosion of support for the Army from the people of the area.

His remarks have the tactical objective of responding to the local anger and projecting India as responsible for the lack of a forward movement on the Siachen issue. His remarks thus have an international and domestic angle.

It would be unwise for India to agree to any stand alone agreement on Siachen. Any ultimate agreement on Siachen has to be part of an overall package that would address India’s concerns relating to the suppression of the Shias of GB who have ethnic links with our Shias of Jammu and Kashmir and the increasing Chinese presence in the area.

The induction of Chinese construction teams and security personnel — all reportedly from the People’s Liberation Army — into the GB area have totally changed the complexity and complexion of the Siachen issue. It is no longer a simple question of mutual withdrawal of troops. Other dimensions having an impact on our security interests in Jammu and Kashmir have emerged since we started talking to Pakistan sporadically on Siachen.

This is not the time for re-opening any talks — substantive or exploratory — on Siachen. We need to have a clear understanding of the implications of the recent developments in GB in order to revisit our strategy in respect of Siachen-related talks.

While we should be cautious and slow-moving on this particular issue, we should not spurn cynically the new — a little more benign — rhetoric of Gen. Kayani on Indo-Pakistan relations in general. This seeming willingness to move away from a compulsive demonization of India has to be encouraged.

I have been advocating for more than a year the beginning of a military-military relationship between the two countries in order to enable senior military officers of the two countries, including the chiefs, to know and assess each other personally instead of depending on third parties and sources for this purpose. This is the time to take advantage of the overtures of Gen.Kayani to set in motion an exercise in this direction. Let us invite Gen. Kayani for an exploratory visit. If he seems reluctant to come, let us request him to depute some other senior officer to come to India on a getting to know each other visit — without a formal agenda.



Please Donate Today
Did you enjoy this article? Then please consider donating today to ensure that Eurasia Review can continue to be able to provide similar content.

B. Raman

B. Raman

B. Raman (August 14, 1936 – June 16, 2013) was Additional Secretary (retd), Cabinet Secretariat, Govt. of India, New Delhi, and Director, Institute For Topical Studies, Chennai and Associate, Chennai Centre For China Studies.

One thought on “India – Pakistan Relations And Kayani’s Smile: How Genuine?

  • Avatar
    April 21, 2012 at 11:36 pm
    Permalink

    For god sake we have had enough!65 years of enmity?wat do we have now(reffering common people of both countries)poverty,superstitiousness,ignorancy,keep accusing eachother…for how long more??
    Lets get togather,lets sit togather and lets sort out our problems and issues by negotiations!being pakistani i have always had love for india as much as i had for pakistan,its my dream to go there oneday to connect with my origins!lets make it true.i swear if both and india pakistan will have goo relations we can be the super power of asia by all aspects!we need to spend on our peoples well being and not on the maintainance of armies for nothing

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.